data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d02cf/d02cf8392b497c82f05cd43f9d34076c3858a25d" alt=""
The book was split into five different reading sections. After reading a section, students would gather and participate in a literature circle. Students were assigned a role on the first week and the roles would rotate each week so each student could have a different job. The roles included: connector/investigator, discussion director, literacy luminary, vocabulary enricher, and illustrator. The connector/investigator had two jobs. The first was to make connections between what they read in that particular section and something they have experienced in the real world. As the investigator, students were to conduct further research on a part of the book whether it be background information on the setting, the author, the weather, etc. The discussion director was the leader of the conversation. They would begin the conversation by asking 3 discussion questions about anything related to the reading section, then an inferential question, a factual question, and an opinion question. Once students responded to the discussion questions, the discussion director would choose the next person to share their role. The literacy luminary’s job was to pick three parts they read in the reading section that they felt were important, interesting, funny, etc. and explain why they believed that part was important. The vocabulary enricher had to choose 6 words that they did not know and find the definitions and share with the group. The illustrator had to draw a picture that had something to do with the reading section and share. After each person shared their role, two responses were allowed in order for the lesson to be completed in 30 minutes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c61b8/c61b825f940f7109fbb55560d9eb4a78980c8d8c" alt=""